The publication that you reference mentions a study, several times, by Ogata et al., and talks about kids under the age of 19. In the study, the median age was 24 (so adults anywhere from 19-30).
There is absolutely nothing in the study that points to "why, at the very least, parents, teens and children should question the Covid-19[sic]" vaccine.
Let me take some quotes from the study, that you may not have actually read.
Limitations of the current study include the small sample size and potential biases that result from enrolling healthy, young adults, which may not be representative of the general population. Future studies should also examine the dynamics of antigen production with neutralization antibodies.
-and-
The clinical relevance of this finding is unknown and should be further explored.
Furthermore, in reference to spike proteins, the study in the document from the CANADIAN COVID CARE ALLIANCE refers to "patients who have died of COVID-19 have thickened pulmonary vascular walls, linking the spike protein to a fatal disease". Not that have had the vaccine - that HAD COVID. They are looking at Spike protein circulation and IF there are any effects. They also talk about PAH in HIV patients.
The research has not been done! Asking the question does not indicate causality which you seem to have figured out somehow.
- Recent studies indicate the spike protein, itself, may potentially be harmful.
- Health Canada authorized the COVID-19 vaccines without biodistribution and pharmacokinetic studies on the virus spike protein.
- The toxicity studies conducted with the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine do not allow for a safety assessment of the spike protein.
Statements like these above are inaccurate. You site studies with no references. Meh.
Children have the same risks with COVID but they may have more resilient immune systems and fewer co-morbidities that allow them to fight the current variants, more so than adults.
The minuscule risks associated with the vaccine far out way the long term effects of the virus or death, in adults.
How about some actual science-based information based on conducted research not rote with innuendo and hyperbole based on asking a question.
RE: Why to at least question the covid 'vaccine' for those under 19 years old