Blog with photos and links >> http://vcbestor.blogspot.com/2017/10/las-vegas-cover-up.html
Why did so many witnesses claim there were multiple shooters, yet law enforcement were quick to blame everything on one suspect? The appalling loss of life and massive injuries don't require us to take a knee for mainstream media's Sept. 29 story about the Las Vegas shooting on October 2. Many also died on 9/11 but the official narrative for that was a snow job.
Before the attack, there was a suspicious sell-off of stocks that may involve a real-estate scandal. Las Vegas hotels seem involved in covering up evidence of multiple gunners.
[ Over 100 FBI agents working the Las Vegas investigation and Sheriff are Covering Up Evidence of Second Shooter ]
Not to jinx anyone but it's statistically bizarre that none of the >500 wounded have died from such high-caliber ammunition and its massive trauma to the body.
It's our duty as citizens in a "free country" to question authority, especially when our authorities have been proven repeatedly to smuggle drugs and traffic weapons to terrorists... or even create terrorists... and cover it up.
[Thanks to Las Vegas Anon on 4chan/pol for exercising our First Amendment Rights!]
How could the one 64-year-old man fire out of two different windows without roller skates while also reloading his weapon several times to shoot at so many people in "nine to eleven" (9-11) minutes?
Who else was in his room? Why did he have so many guns (23, with more at home)? It calls for speculation.
The accused, Paddock, could have been involved in a gun-running operation.
Paddock's dad
An official cover up may point to something like Operation Fast and Furious. The man's father was a bank robber so perhaps crime connections were inherited. At any rate, Paddock could have used his private plane(s) to run guns. In this case, he may have been in the middle of a transaction in the hotel when the buyers grabbed the guns and started shooting. Since ISIS/ISIL did take credit, they may have planned to turn the "purchase" into a massacre all along.
The weapons-dealer scenario certainly could explain why there were cameras set up in the room and hallway.
Illegal arms trafficking has involved our government agencies in the past.
Rumors fly.
Reportedly we can't see the muzzle flashes because of the curtains; psychologically, it makes no sense that the "maniac" wouldn't even look at the mayhem he created. More likely, the curtains hid something odd.
Auditory and other* unofficial evidence, a newscast and eyewitnesses indicate multiple shooters at different locations up to 45 minutes after shots from Paddock's room... but some government investigators have decided that evidence must be discarded. ATF on the other hand say the shot security guard was an accomplice. The security guard Jesus Campos avoided "199 bullets in a hallway not much wider than 6' and only was hit by 1 bullet?" He was shot before the barrage on the fairgrounds; this contradicts earlier reports that the security guard stopped Paddock's mania. "Why did the killer ever stop shooting on the crowd if the security guard did not stop him?"
Mainstream media misstated what day Paddock checked into the hotel, perhaps to reduce the video surveillance footage that reveals his companions.
[ T i m e l i n e ]
Facebook repeatedly deleted a video that went viral with auditory evidence of multiple shooters.
In any case, only one gun does not mean Paddock was what authorities tell us.
TWO guns?
Are Feds shifting blame for the worst shooting in US history?
An "ordinary bystander" actress was ready to deliver the deep-state message that "we need more policing."
On a completely unrelated note: I suspect Hillary would be president now if Americans were not armed.
The author VC Bestor is Director of the non-profit
FangedWilds.org,
a project encouraging women to engage constructively with apex predators.
"Find the meat of the matter"
V.C Bestor on Twitter
