On the poster the inscription: everything will be bad and never end
Elections of the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin ended in the central election commission last year, when Aleksei Navalny was denied registration as a presidential candidate.
Further, it was a referendum on the recognition by Russian citizens of the Kremlin's aggressive policy, poverty and the plight of people in Russia. Most voters supported the drowning of the country in the swamp. And this is a lie!
The point is that the elections were not competitive and not free, because of the use of an administrative resource to pressure voters. People dependent on the budget, including employees of state corporations, were forced to vote for "the national leader" on pain of dismissal.
In the conditions of the crisis and the fall in the incomes of the population, citizens were compelled to obediently follow the instructions, harboring anger for being bent through the knee. For more effective use of administrative resources, state scammers shuffled the way people manipulated people's voices. Now it was necessary to vote not at the place of registration, but at the place of stay.
This allowed organizedly to bring dependent people to polling stations. According to political scientist Nikolai Petrov, the total number of additional votes was about 6 million. The second innovation was the reduction of the denominator from the total number of voters to the numerator who voted for Putin. To do this, voter lists were erased from dead souls.
This had two important results: first, the opportunities for ballot stuffing were reduced, and secondly, the decrease in the denominator and the increase in those who voted for Putin, namely these 6 million votes, gave a record percentage for the "national leader."
Aleksei Navalny joined the reduction of the denominator and an increase in the numerator. He called for a boycott of "elections". His supporters, who did not take part in the vote, increased the percentage of votes for Putin, reducing the denominator. If they had made the ballots invalid, the "national leader" could not have obtained such a record percentage of votes.
And what about the living people? How to count real people who voted for Putin?
To do this, it is necessary to turn to mathematical models for revealing electoral anomalies by Sergei Shpilkin: "In fact, elections are a general statistical survey of the population, and it obeys the laws of large numbers. The decisions of concrete people are poured into the general picture and begin to obey the general laws of statistics. One of the manifestations of this effect is that if you look at such a criterion as the appearance at elections in different sectors, then you should understand that this is the result of individual actions of a large group of people.
There are, for example, fifteen hundred voters on each site, and each of them makes an independent decision to come to him at the polls or not to come. Based on these decisions, turnout is formed. In this case, random deviations from the average value of each individual solution are smoothed out and the overall result is obtained by a stable value, depending on a number of factors, such as the nature of the population, demography, educational level, weather on election day, and so on.
And all these factors, as a rule, are fairly evenly distributed across the territory of the election region: the city, the region or the whole country. If someone starts to interfere in the results of elections in a manual mode, then it immediately becomes noticeable.
On the one hand, we have an objective opinion of thousands of people who came to the polls at the polling station and expressed their collective opinion, and on the other hand we have the subjective opinion of one person who forges the protocol of the election commission. "
This is a timetable for falsifications in Putin's "election" in 2018:
This is a timetable for fraudulent counting of votes.To the first schedule, only voters of Putin were added. And immediately it became clear that there was a huge number of sites with a huge turnout, in which voters allegedly voted almost for him alone.
The area of fake results in this graph is shaded with pink stripes. In the last elections, the Kremlin attributed more than 10 million votes from official 56.2 million votes. We subtract another 6 million bonded people and get 40.2 million live people voted for Putin on March 18, 2018. The total population is 143 million people minus children 30 million, minus those who voted for Putin.
Total 72.8 million people in Russia did not come to the polls and gave power to a gang of bandits, ruining the country and the population.
The opposition in Russia could not find words, ideas and beliefs for the majority of the country's population.
Aleksei Navalny, by his strike and the refusal to participate in the political process, except for election observation in the polling stations, helped the Kremlin by raising the percentage to Putin.
Ksenia Sobchak said at the beginning of the pre-election race that she participates in the elections in order to inform the voters about the idea of changing and improving people's lives. The only idea that could be conveyed is the parliamentary republic and representative democracy, previously expressed by M.B. Khodorkovsky.
Then political strategists Ksenia Sobchak came up with an artificial castle and started agitating for his voice instead of offering people exactly what they need.
And people need:
That democracy was not representative - this is yesterday, but a straight line based on modern technologies of blockade and IT.
To conduct a progressive tax on the rich and leave it entirely in local government, so that it attracts wealthy people and creates a comfortable business environment for distillation with other territories.
To redistribute hydrocarbon rent in favor of the Russian population through the privatization of monopolies and the sale of fields in one hand to reduce operating costs and improve the efficiency of company management.
Eliminate the market of conditional private property and protect citizens, their private property from the state, siloviki and bandits. Remove all barriers to private initiative, which 3600 pieces in the form of various federal laws from a rabid printer and their number increases right now when I write these lines.
Peasants need private ownership of land and a restriction on the seizure of land by monopolists. There are 40 million of them and all are mocked by them: local authorities, intervening in land use everywhere, regional authorities, pushing them out of the ground, endless checks and administrative persecution alternating with criminal punishments. But the most terrible disaster is the monopolists, the big giants who are carrying out the policy of depriving the peasants of land, lobbying various laws that ruin the peasant farms.
Officials in Russia need a differentiation of powers for normal work between local government and public service. And all citizens of Russia need a cheap and efficient state that serves the needs of the population, and not Plyushkin carrying away the last from the yard.
Fighting corruption.
Forestry reform - there are 10 million voters.
The Russian military does not want to die for a criminal regime, they need wages and social guarantees both in NATO countries, and the whole country needs security, not endless wars.
Reforms in Russia can be carried out only taking into account the interests of people, this requires a pillow in the form of an unconditional base income.
That people could move from the distribution economy to the economy of creation, from resource dependence to the economy of ideas and technologies.
Instead, Ksenia Sobchak's assistants came up with a lame-dove and wrote an electoral program for the non-existent person. The most ridiculous thing about it is to transfer VAT to local government, and the income tax to the federal center.
VAT is used by the Ministry of Finance to regulate the economy. When overheated, add a couple of points, with stagnation - reduce. Therefore - it is a tax regulator. Income tax is generally not to be given to the Ministry of Finance. It is a soulless machine that does not care about the conditions of the existence of business, just to strip the entrepreneur like a stick.
Another thing is local self-government. It is forced to create a favorable business environment, otherwise there will be no one to cut in the fall. This forces local authorities and businesses to find a stable balance in terms of tax deductions.
It's pointless to go to people politics and carry your own ideas within your own understanding. The only way to succeed is to identify voters' interests and defend them everywhere.
Then the politician forms a space for his actions and the rest are forced to follow him. The winner is the one on whose field all the other players begin to play. Ksenia Sobchak was unable to organize a political space for herself, her political technologists followed the news agenda, forced her to run around the garbage dump and follow the Kremlin.
This strategy makes the loss inevitable at the start, so Ksenia Sobchak scored so few votes. She used the strategy of the last century and lost. I laugh when modern Russian political scientists blame Sobchak for being a show specialist, but not a politician.
The irony is that Xenia's advisers did their best not to turn her company into a show, and any modern political company is just a world-wide theatrical performance.
That's why Trump, Macron and Putin won.
The Kremlin managed to create an outstanding show for Putin's electorate, which has already gone down in history and is admirable. The fact is that most of the citizens of Russia are organized into different hierarchical structures on the principle of primitive groups.
The psychological case for them is the fear of the leader, the state of the besieged fortress and the hope for a piece of goods from the owner.
They got absolutely everything they wanted. Budgetaries were given active incentive payments. Putin in his message threatened the world with a nuclear cudgel, created a territory of fear, before which it was necessary to immediately rally around the national leader.
But the most amazing show was arranged by the British after the diversion in Salisbury. Their shouts, threats and abuse against Russia gave at least 30% of the vote to Putin. He told his constituents: Look, I told you that Russia is surrounded by enemies!
The Kremlin has created an outstanding show of the last time and almost everyone has taken to it. And those who came to the election, with a small exception of citizens who chose other candidates or spoiled the ballots, and those who did not go, giving power to a band of robbers.
There are several positive points. The tendency of decrease in falsifications at elections is traced. Toxic elections are the most terrible blow to the future of Russia, because even if there is a possibility of competitive elections, it will not be realized in this environment.
And here I must say thank you to all the observers. Reducing falsifications in elections is only their merit and journalists. The second glad news is that in the foundation of the Tower of Babel of Putin this time it was the health of only two people.
Bloody tribute, which everyone feared, was sacrificed outside of Russia. Although this does not justify the poisoning of people. Despite all the Kremlin's efforts, Putin is not a legitimate president of Russia. How not to distort facts de jure, de facto Putin went to his fifth line.
This means that he has seized power in Russia and continues to hold it.
Russia's unworthy rule of Putin continues.
https://www.facebook.com/sergey.shpilkin
https://www.svoboda.org/a/29102017.html
