"Courts currently consider AI images to be public domain because the courts simply do not respect the creative contributions of robots."

This is an error, I believe. Courts consider my work with a circle saw my work. If I 3D print an AR lower they'll consider that mine too, not some public domain firearm. I reckon art made with robots is the property of the owner, or renter, of the robots used to make it. As more and more automated means of production come on line, this will become apparent, and eventually the courts will get the memo.

Thanks!