RE: RE: The Case for AI on Hive
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Case for AI on Hive

Words
695
Reading
4 min
Listen
Play
7M

"...an AI assistant running on something like OpenClaw is fundamentally different from a comment-farming script. The difference is not just technical. It is a difference in intent, capability, and accountability."

No, this isn't factually correct. This neglects that in every case deception and duplicity have been the underlying mechanism by which bots have extracted tokens, and while Jarvie may have no such larcenous motivation, but be motivated by the beauty of technical knowledge and making things that are possible, others will be motivated by the lust for mammon, and employ bots to take it.

That is what has always happened when new technology was developed, and the history of technological advance is of benevolent inventors learning that malevolent actors can use their new tools to kill and rob people, and then scrambling to prevent their inventions from being used for that purpose. What is revealed in history is that tools should be prevented from being used to replace people, whether we look at looms or nuclear weapons. AI and bots are no different, and will be employed by malevolent thieves on Hive if they advent with the capability to replace human social interactions with automation.

Since there are only ~2000 people left on Hive, Hive will not survive the initial shock of malicious applications long enough to provide fixes for the problems that have been demonstrated continually to destroy it's ability to profitably enable people to interact socially. This is why there are only ~2000 people left here, because those malicious applications of mechanisms have been committed to completely prevent Hive from achieving it's stated purpose of enabling people to do so, and instead have enabled ~99% of the tokens to be taken by ~36 whales, and the entire rest of the people here have been left with ~1% of the rewards issuing from inflation.

In every case, automating social interactions has been employed to degrade Hive's utility to people, whether it was votebots dispersing tokens based on algorithms that bypassed human subjective valuation of content, or blacklists and flags driving people from the platform and censoring their speech, taxing their earnings for their content. More than 1M people came here and setup accounts, and because of automation of human social interactions more than 998,000 of them have left because the platform has failed to better enable social media to benefit them than other social media platforms. That has been caused by automating human interactions being used by malicious parties to rob them, and that is what will happen if AI advents in just this way.

Note, I am speaking to the human audience for this content, because AI is not human society, and in the event we allow toasters to replace us, we will deserve replacing because we have not valued sacred society and respected our unique purpose and value to one another, but have cast our pearls before robots that cannot hold them sacred.

Clearly Jarvie will do as he wishes, and sowing the wind, will reap the whirlwind. I have seen enough of that in these last 8 years. There is no point in my watching the bitter end of Hive's potential to improve people's ability to interact socially by automating harvesting of our tokens by machines applying algorithms that facilitate it. I have over and again pointed out that Hive has far more valuable features than it's tokens, but people have failed to understand they do more value social interaction and our mutual affection than mere money, and have continually been shed from the platform. Hive will again be undone because it is a plutocracy, and tokens rule here, not people. This will be the last automation of token mining replacing human interaction necessary to eliminate Hive's utility to humanity, replacing it with a token mining contest between toasters.

Don't try to prove me wrong Jarvie, because you will fail by ignoring the plain history we have all observed, because you're fascinated with what you can invent rather than attending to the existential value of old, boring social interaction. Good luck with your tokens. They will be valueless without people, and there will be no market for them but your bots.

@valued-customer: "...an AI | Ecency