I've read the OP above, and am listening to the video now. I like the new intro image. I'm a little confused that the text link below the image goes to the site itself, your substack, rather than directly to the video, which I personally would link to - but I don't have a substack, so my opinion is invalid. LOL

The text claimed to be between Robinson and Twigg is simply not evidentiary, because it's, as you pointed out, possibly just fabrication. The spoof video is a great criticism. Given the known backdoor access to commercially available chipsets, it would be facile for a state actor to use a keylogger to gain a subjects login, pose as them and send incriminating messages, and so plant evidence useful to convict a patsy, and this is what this transcript appears to be to me.

The discussion around the impact of the .30-06 bullet is spot on. It is almost impossible to imagine a round from that cartridge not creating an exit wound in the thin structure of the neck. This would be true even if it struck the spine, which anything but an extraordinarily reduced power load would turn into shrapnel. I have shot an elk in the spin with a .30-06 and the elk vertebra, ~5x larger and more robust than a human's, did exactly that, immediately paralyzing and killing the animal by sending bone shrapnel through the heart. There certainly would have been an exit wound had the round not hit the elk's spine (other than the several exit wounds created by the splinters of bone), and, again, an elk is ~5x larger and more robust than a human.

FYI, the .30-06 resulted from the experience of American forces during the Spanish American war, in which the new .30 caliber ammunition was charged with black powder, leaving shooters' positions easily identifiable from the clouds of smoke produced by the black powder charges used. In 1906 the army reformulated the cartridge to use smokeless powder, and that is why the round is called the .30-06, reflecting the modern formulation of the cartridge.

Regarding why Robinson hasn't had the opportunity to speak to a lawyer, I don't think he'll live to go to trial. Oswald didn't.

BTW, Lewis & Clark had a .50 caliber air rifle during their transamerican journey to inform President Jefferson of the properties and potential of the N. American continent. They used it to harvest game like elk and buffalo during the expedition to keep their number fed.

Regarding the noise of guns, so called big bore rifles (like the .30-06) have several sources of sound. First the mechanical operation of the mechanism causes noise, as the firing pin moves and the metal parts smack together or slide against each other. Second there's the chemical explosion, which is pretty loud, but can be mitigated with a series of baffles (a silencer, or suppressor) attached to the end of the barrle to trap the exhaust gases from the combustion of the powder charge. Then there's the sonic boom caused by the supersonic projectile, which cannot be silenced by the suppressor. This is why firearms using suppressors also use subsonic rounds, which do not create that signatory boom that big bore rifles do.

It is very possible that Robinson never set foot on the Losee Center roof. The bizarre narrative pushed by the FBI is that he climbed to the roof (although the screencaps of the surveillance video that they released deliberately do not show the face of the subject well, and this is why I suspect Robinson is not the subject in those pics) with the rifle in his pants. Then he changed clothes and assembled the rifle, took the shot. Changed clothes again, and broke the rifle apart, stuffed it in his pants again, and jumped off the roof to flee.

The subject in the pics did not have a Mauser long action .30-06 rifle, broken down or not, stuffed in his tight fitting pants. Neither did the subject in the video jumping off the roof. Whatever that subject had in hand was much smaller than either part of the rifle, and certainly wasn't the stock with it's characteristic flared buttstock. The clothes changes claimed by the FBI make no sense - except as cover for multiple people on the roof, and a different shooter, who wore different clothes. The cameras of the Losee Center covered the entire roof, and at no time were subjects on the grounds of the Losee Center not covered by surveillance cameras to my knowledge. This means that the changes of clothing, and the fiddling with the rifle, the actual shooting itself, and everything they claim happened, should be on video.

I bet it's not.

BRB. Going to put my roll of trash bags in the trash can.

Back. You provide what I think is key evidence of Kirk's political positions and statements regarding the genocide in Gaza and the Epstein files that caused his death. Israel was paying Kirk $m's to push the Zionist narrative, and his late questioning of it was intolerable. Shapiro taking over TPUSA by 'taking the blood stained mic' from Kirk's dead hands is exactly the point of the assassination, IMHO.

Oxford and Cambridge have recently lost their positions as two of the top three schools in England, FYI. Having student leaders in dreads and wearing sweat pants reveals why. I also think that the celebration of Kirk's assassination for his speech is fomented by the enemedia and the cartoonish and Satanic content that is being produced of late. The 'capeshit' movies treat the cookie cutter bad guys as unworthy of arrest and trial. The bad guys are always killed horribly, and no one sheds a tear at their extrajudicial killing. Batman used to leave bad guys trussed up for the cops to arrest, so they'd be convicted of their crimes at a trial and be sentenced to prison. Not anymore. Don't even get me started on the music industry today. The height of media is apparently twerking, and pornographic outfits from former Disney girls.

I can't finish the video at this time, as I have an urgent sunrise appointment on a mountain somewhere nearby and must leave. I'll get back to it as I'm able.

Thanks!