I've been having network issues too. I hope this isn't the start of the issues I anticipate coming.

The reason certain words and phrasing are used in these situations is that the psyops research recommends their use, and this information is provided to the participating producers, at least to my understanding. General sentiment is pretty successfully produced by this mechanism, I believe. Specific individuals are availed specific propaganda based on the detailed surveillance data and results of experience creating sentiment. This is why our content is today being tailored to us specifically, with comment sections being censored to create the appropriate input that generates the desired output of our opinions.

There are probably better ways to resolve the gang problem than brute force. I can think of several. Not sure the landlords are aware they are being eliminated for reasons, but understanding the political movement affecting them enables effectively meeting the purpose these gangs are being deployed to achieve. By hook or by crook the economy is being centralized, and this is why the gangs are being deployed, because the financial assets aren't easy to dislodge from their possessors and this is the most effective mechanism available. There are reasons these problems are arising where they are, and the specific targets are hit, and understanding why these targets are hit better enables effective response.

Regarding shipping water laden products, your point about the peaches is key. The cost of shipping overseas is low, and the cost of laborious packaging is high. Also, many chemicals require very expensive containment when concentrated, which dilution with water reduces dramatically or eliminates altogether.

If certain encryption mechanisms have been compromised, the solution is diversification and even bespoke mechanisms, because if everyone uses RSA and RSA gets cracked, everyone is exposed. Each mechanism requires specific solutions, so bespoke mechanisms make the diversity of uses less vulnerable.

Justin Bieber would be very likely to be horrified if such candid videos of his association with Diddy during his early career became public, IMHO. So would Usher. Your point about the FBI using that material reveals the purpose of blackmail. It is absolutely capable of controlling polities by controlling the persons in power, and this is true about any institution. I have been making this point for years regarding Trump, as the Trump administration gained such material from the Weiner laptop, NXIVM, and Epstein, and probably much else not so publicly aired, and Trump's apprenticing to Roy Cohn and Epstein strongly suggests he has the skills to make use of that material effectively. Blackmail material is only useful for extortion as long as it remains secret, and this makes the blackmailers vulnerable to being taken down and their material becoming useful to whoever gains it thereby.

Good drug dealers do not sample their products, and good blackmailers don't either. Someone that didn't have any vulnerabilities blackmailers could extort could be immune to the direct threat of exposure that is the most effective security blackmailers have.

Ralph Baric was certainly a critical actor in the development of SARS2, and his public statements and research shows this pretty clearly. The release of these documents will be probative, and the judge faces existential threats to prevent them from releasing that proof. We'll see if they survive to rule, or survive their ruling, and how they rule.

Elon Musk misstates the population collapse problem. It isn't coming. It is ongoing. The fertility crisis is global, not only suffered in the West. Automation makes collective labor obsolete, so supporting hordes of people is no longer necessary, and the sectors of the economy that are necessary to those people are being defunded. Gaza is the model for the rest of the world as the transition to decentralized automation proceeds, because the current oligarchs seek to further centralize wealth and power they control.

They want to own everything. They don't want to share it with 'useless eaters'. The solution to this challenge is for individuals that intend to survive to adopt such means of production suitable to their circumstances and create networks of interdependent producers that are independent of extant centralized mechanisms. Those centralized mechanisms will be weapons used against anyone dependent on them.

Thanks!