You are absolutely right about sharks. Microshaft is all teeth, and it is unfathomable to me that any non-profit board could be convinced to allow the spawn of Bill Gates a seat. I have zero confidence anyone from such a source of directors would have any other goal than directing financial resources for the benefit of Microshaft. Somehow such NGO's are convinced to allow Microshaft a seat on their boards, and since it is almost inconceivable that Microshaft wouldn't use such representation to gain financial benefit, it is also almost inconceivable that those boards aren't gaining financial benefit from allowing Microshaft to join them. Long practice has enabled such institutions to conceal such corruption, however, and I bet any such financial encomiums those board members receive are well hidden.

Regarding AGI, my understanding of the model of human consciousness the neural networks employed to create the sorting mechanisms that LLM and Stable Diffusion are (and that's all they are, is sorting mechanisms) supposes that sentience, consciousness, or 'personhood', is something the brain creates. All the research I have done completely refutes that concept. While the brain somehow modulates consciousness, the fact that single celled organisms both independently possess it and participate in human consciousness proves that consciousness does not arise in the brain, because single celled creatures cannot have brains (which are networks of specialized cells that single celled creatures do not have, by definition).

Mechanisms to sort things, whether bits of ore or strings of text, have no need to understand anything about the purpose of the ore, or the meaning of the text. LLMs do not have any understanding of the text they compose, nor Stable Diffusion any understanding of the emotional impact of artwork. Calling them AI is deceptive. There is no intelligence involved. They are just sorting mechanisms.

For this reason, it is difficult to imagine me being more skeptical of claims they have approached, or attained, AGI. What I see demonstrated, instead, is that the vast majority of financial assets in the world are controlled by interlocked directorates with controlling interests in all corporate entities purchased by BlackRock, through the magic of Quantitative Easing after the 2008 banking crisis that BlackRock was contracted to manage by the USG. Since corporations provide the directors of the Open AI NGO, and since all corporations involved are controlled by BlackRock, sotto voce collusion to use Open AI to benefit BlackRock, such as by lying about AGI, is inherent to the Open AI board of directors. Microshaft is one of the corporations BlackRock has a controlling interest in.

" Microsoft's Largest Shareholders (Dec 2022)
Shareholder Ownership Voting Power
Vanguard 8.6% 8.6%
BlackRock 7.1% 7.1%
Steve Ballmer 4.5% 4.5%
Bill Gates 0.9% 0.9%
Other 78.9% 78.9%
Listed are shareholders holding >5% of any share class or notable in other ways
Source: Multiple SEC filings"

https://www.kamilfranek.com/who-owns-microsoft-largest-shareholders/

Note: BlackRock, Vanguard, and StateStreet each invest in one another, making them essentially controlled by a single pool of investors, a megacorporation. Also, while BlackRock and Vanguard cannot simply outvote all other investors, as the largest voting block (and an unknown degree of control through the ~79% of 'other' stakeholders) in practice this enables them to control votes of the board of directors. This is why they are said to have a controlling interest, rather than a majority stake, in Microshaft.

Just as we see Microshaft seeking to capture Open AI for it's own profits (which are simply upstream of BlackRock's profits), BlackRock has managed USG money creation and distributions since 2008 to create an octopus of controlling interests in the stock corporations of the world, and BlackRock is that octopus. Including Microshaft. Including all member corporations of the WEF. BlackRock has managed the global financial crisis response in order to gain control of all the corporations (and governments, through covert corruption) of the world through it's direction of the distribution of QE under contract to the USG. BlackRock is the NWO.

If the idea of AGI can be used to scare people, and it sure can, then the aeons old practice of terrorism - using fear to get people to implement political policies desirable to the terrorists - is being used by BlackRock to gain the known goal of the NWO of global conquest and imposition of a technocratic totalitarian tyranny.

It is for this reason, that I see this process in motion, that I have sought to create mechanisms that enable me to provide services and attain them independent of money - because money is the only mechanism that BlackRock can use to gain these powers. I no longer pay money in mortgage payments, property taxes, or rent for my residence, or for my phone, and continue to seek similar arrangements for all the variety of goods and services I need and use. Every exchange in which I am provided money for my services increases my vulnerability to BlackRock, and I account it an increase in control over me. The more I depend on money, the more I am vulnerable to financial control, and the less I am vulnerable to financial control the more freedom I have.

The hardest thing I have to do is enable people to grasp that money is a burden because of that control because people see that spending their money enables their attainment to goods and services, and they view the burdens of taxes, fees, and financial reporting as separate impositions on them, rather than intrinsic to money itself. They think of them as simply additional expenses, when they are inherent to the financial assets themselves. I do not have taxes, fees, or reporting requirements regarding goodwill, and this shows that I am not purchasing anything with my taxes, fees, and reporting of financial assets. Those burdens are inherent to money, they come with money I receive. Goodwill is not encumbered by them as is money.

The NWO cannot rule the world through goodwill, and only insofar as we are dependent on money can we be ruled by the NWO. I am not simply avoiding expenses by using goodwill instead of money. I am creating freedom, and a model everyone can employ to be free from the global tyranny being imposed. Money isn't wealth. Money is the bars of the prison, the chains of the slavery, used to subject us to despotic tyranny, and the less money we have the more free we are - as long as we can still attain the goods and services that create the blessings of civilization. The difficulty of attaining to the blessings of civilization without money comes from the increasing capture of society by financial mechanisms because people do not understand society and government aren't the same thing. People know what they have learned, and people have learned to use money, so use it in every endeavor, despite the greater the accumulation of money the greater the burden it imposes on them. They aren't taught that goodwill can attain to the blessings of civilization without encumbering them with the burdens inherent to money, and it's a learning curve that must be climbed like any other before people understand it.

Goodwill buys freedom, while money buys slavery.

Thanks!