RE: RE: Did China just accidentally leak real data on Wuhan virus? #Tencentleak
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Did China just accidentally leak real data on Wuhan virus? #Tencentleak

Words
345
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
7y

I find the TenCent glitch compelling, because adding the number of suspected and confirmed cases and then calculating the confirmed deaths using those numbers results in a mortality rate of ~10.5% (233,831 infected and 24589 deaths), which closely matches 11% as calculated by The Lancet later in your video from 100 cases, a far smaller dataset.

Additionally, given the estimated R0 of 4.08 from The Lancet, the number of infected arrived at in the above calculation is much closer to estimates (~75000) than what China officially reported on that date, although about thrice what The Lancet estimated. The official number is orders of magnitude lower, which is far more divergent from that estimate than merely triple. The official number is thousands of times farther from the estimate than the TenCent glitch numbers. [Edit: I failed to note that The Lancet estimate is for Jan. 25, while the Tencent glitch number is from Feb. 1, which strongly rectifies those numbers due to the time difference. I have not performed the calculation necessary to determine how much.] It seems that difference is not due to inability to get better numbers, but due to deliberate misreporting.

For various reasons I consider it highly unlikely that China is actually reporting factually, in addition to being unable to get highly accurate numbers. This would further implicate the WHO and other sources in an attempt to misrepresent how virulent and pathological this virus is in order to highly control social order.

kungflumortalityfake.jpg

The above image reveals that official reporting from China appears to be designed to give a false R0 and mortality rate, using the stated calculation method, rather than be actual real world data.

The TenCent flub seems to prove that the mortality rate calculated by The Lancet seems very accurate, roughly 5x what China's official reports suggest. However, I will point out that mortality rate is only for the initial symptoms, and no data is available at all for the subsequent disease that will result from the immune suppression stemming from the lymphopenia nCoV has been shown to cause.

Thanks!

@valued-customer: I find the TenCent | Ecency