I have formerly participated in the token burn posts, but my understanding of currency has evolved such that I now reckon wider distribution would more benefit Hive than increasing extant token value.
Were I yet convinced of your oligarchical membership I would yammer about the plot to prevent adoption in order to prevent domination of governance by acquisition of Hive by off platform investors. Now I reckon your interest in the token derives from your personal plans, which seem not to be based on gaining wider distribution and more users, but to focus on increasing the scarcity of tokens to increase the value of those you hold. My own fiscal policies are also consistent with my stake, so I'm not flinging accusations, but simply noting that our policies are consequent to our resources and plans.
Thanks!
RE: How much burned by the burn posts in July?