RE: RE: New Hive Spam Network
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: New Hive Spam Network

Words
216
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6y

I know for a fact that fulltimegeek@fulltimegeek was on that list, because I saw his account on it. I know for a fact he personally posted a copious quantity of spam, at least matched by Bernie.

I have never spammed anyone. Ever.

I am disagreeable, on that I agree.

I do not know if you simply miss-recall or if you are deliberately misstating facts, but fulltimegeek@fulltimegeek was on that list.

Bernie, on the other hand, kept spamming for a long time after that, which is why you have joe.public@joe.public on that list now, because he responded to that spam.

Answering comments isn't spam unless the original comments are spam, and Bernie isn't on the list, so you must reckon his comments weren't spam. All the more ridiculous you consider replies to it to have been spam.

Get joe.public@joe.public off that list, or continue to reveal the danger of censorship without community control to everyone that posts on Hive.

Your censorship may be the most dangerous threat to the Hive community extant. Put that power in public control and cease being a threat of centralized censorship to this community.

It is exactly the same threat Sun Yuchen was to Steem, except his view of governance and censorship differed from yours. It's the identical threat, for different reasons.

@valued-customer: I know for a | Ecency