Wow! I thought I created walls of text. I kneel.

"...blue dog democrats..."

Is that a term you coined? I've heard of Yellow Dog Democrats, that would vote for a yellow dog if it ran as a Democrat, but blue dogs are new to me.

"That rocket had the potential to interfere with the polar vortex..."

That seems a bit overblown. Is that just hyperbole, or do you have some data or calculation that suggests that? I am curious.

"...mounds of snow from Musk rocket exploding over the Caribbean Islands ensuring plenty of moisture pushes in off the Atlantic..."

I'm pretty sure a couple thousand tons of methane is utterly insignificant compared to the volume of the atmosphere, and it would take many thousands of rockets to push any moisture on shore. You seem to have given this thought, which implies some numbers or quantification has been attempted. I'd be really interested in seeing any figures you had.

"It would become particularly concerning if a trend started to develop of the government making substantial gains off natural disasters."

Truer words have never been spoke!

"He's just a man who got lucky..."

I don't care for The Elon, but that's ridiculous.

"Same goes for Peter Thiel..."

I'm not sure you have a real grasp of the hunger it takes to get where they got, and the level and quality of the competition for the resources they have, but dummies don't just luck into their circumstances.

"...methane, can last hundreds of years trapped in the upper atmospheres."

Methane is perhaps the fuel most gentle on the environment potential to rocketry. It's combustion produces CO2, the basis for all life which there are a gazillion biological pathways to process, and water. If everything goes right, very little unburned methane, if any, enters the atmosphere during rocket launch. During an RUD there is some methane released, but this is the least environmentally harmful product released. Hypergolic fuels that NASA used to use, now those were toxic!

"...a bright light that looked similar to a flame was seen streaking on radar out of area 51 in Nevada..."

More than one claim of magic has been made regarding the LA fires. One I haven't heard is that ayliums that live on the surface of the sun simply took a pee break in LA and accidentally started the fires while they were out doing their equivalent of drunk driving. That and the claim of fire being projected from Area 51 seem equally credible to me.

"...Assad's army couldn't fight back against advancing forces because their planes, tanks, and other mechanical war weapons had mysteriously been disabled."

First I've heard of this, and I paid attention to that event as it happened, with at least one eye peeled even while I slept. What is your source for this claim?

I don't find it credible, because I am unaware of any mechanism that can prevent infernal combustion engines or chemical combustion mechanisms that fire weapons from functioning from a distance, which must be what is being claimed. I drive a 1980 VW pickup - at great expense to repair lately, I might add - specifically because it is purely a mechanical device and has no electronics to hack, which secures me from all manner of insults and injuries modern tech invites.

"...German companies are the suppliers being used to rebuild war torn areas occupied by Russia in Ukraine..."

I have not heard that Russia is contracting that out to it's enemy Germany in this war. Please provide source.

"...a remarkable recovery...under the External Revenue Service off collecting the tariffs made off imports to rebuild weather devastated areas..."

Stop! I'm almost willing to support these skeezy bastards if that happens. Trading the IRS for the ERS alone is almost enough to get me to the barricades with a solar powered bow and arrow made from eel farts and fairy dust against whatever demonic or aylium forces may be. I would die on that hill for the American people to have that boon, for my sons to live free from the scourge of illegal taxation of their wages as 'income', which is truly and actually return on investments, not wages, and for which wages there is no legal basis for taxing.

I appreciate the lengthy effort and considerable thought you have put into this post. I lament the lack of citations of source of the above indicated claims. Many of them are insuperable by commonly available scientific knowledge, so asserting them really recommends sourcing them.

Thanks!