You seem not to understand the chart. Do you see where the vaccines are introduced? These diseass were all almost totally under control by the time the vaccines were introduced. That was my point. Vaccines did not do most of the job. They actually almost had no effect compared to the effects we had already achieved.

Scarlett Fever is a particularly good example of this, and why it's on the chart.

"Scarlett fever ran rampant, discovered in 1685 but it is a bacterium not a virus, there is no Scarlett fever vaccine, Scarlett Fever wasn't cured until penicillin was discovered in 1928."

But Scarlett Fever was almost completely eradicated by 1927. Penicillin did not reduce Scarlett Fever deaths even remotely as much as better hygience already had.

These diseases were not eradicated by vaccines, but by better treatment and living conditions, and that's what this chart shows.

"They couldn't have known anyone had whooping cough at it wasn't discovered until 1906"

Do you just make stuff up? You're claiming the first case of Whooping Cough was1906. You know that's false.

I am observing that you are utterly going to ignore facts and reality and stick to your story. There's no point in discussing it then. No one will be proved wrong except you when you stick to your story despite it being false.

Won't hurt me none, and I'm not responsible for you. Good luck with that.