First, I make no apologies for Humanism. Humans are what we are, and should be.

"It is those such as yourself, who characterise men weaker and less fortunate as "parasites"..."

I am not actually sure who is misunderstanding who in this regard. I do consider the parasitic class weaker and less fortunate than ordinary men, who are able to regard their peers as men like themselves and live fulfilling lives, even know joy betimes. However, by the parasitic class I mean those that would order society for their own benefit: rank overlords that care only for their power over others, and not men without legs that are competent to feed themselves and their families with the sweat of their brow, no matter money.

So, I don't know if you have me right, and understand how I feel about such overlords, or if you have mistaken my discussion of wealth as regarding money instead.

When I speak of wealth, I do not speak of money. Money is a veil behind which real wealth can be concealed, mostly from them with too much money in the way to see real wealth. Money will soon be obsolete, while wealth will ever bless it's possessors. To be wealthy is to be of independent means, and that is what decentralization is beginning to provide all men: independent means of production.

Independence is another word for freedom. Regardless of your political opinion, or mine, that equality of station, security, and wealth is coming for us all, whether we like it or not. I happen to look greatly forward to it. You will benefit no less than others from having authority to make what you need, and perhaps moreso from the responsibility you will have to do so than anything else.

Legless or multilimbed, AI and technology will avail us of equal access to real wealth, and that false pretense of wealth - money - will become obsolete when it does.

Enjoy. It's coming.