First, I wasn't discussing SPS itself, so don't confuse the issue. Further, as I was commenting exclusively on your explication of how that funding mechanism is controllable, the disparagement you apply to me actually reflects on your own explanation. This is what you said:

"There is a return proposal (which gets votes like any other). Any proposals that get more votes than return get paid (until total funding runs out)."

If 'return' isn't voting against a proposal, please explain what it actually is?