Whoo boy. Lot's of interesting questions for me. Good. It is just such probing clarity that enables me to better understand things.
As to a conspiracy involving millions of health care personnel, there isn't one. The doctors, pharmacists, and nurses aren't in on the take, nor are they pushing fake news on purpose. Doctors are not researchers or virologists for the most part. Their training is mostly in diagnostics and what pills to prescribe. The ones that do research and specialize in epidemiology and virology are either making a lot of money and disinterested in rocking boats that might cause that money to spill out, or are speaking out and are being censored. Nurses and pharmacists are even less likely to be researchers or virologists, and for their entire careers have been conditioned to believe what they're told about health issues.
A few I can name that seem well qualified to discuss this issue are Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Prize winning virologist who seems quite confident and knowledgeable in his statements that the vaccines for Covid are more harmful than good, causing ADE. Another is Russ Malone, who invented mRNA vaccines, and whose last statement I read said the data looked like ADE was happening, and he was going to look at that more thoroughly. Then there's Dr. Zelenko, who treated President and Mrs. Trump, the President of Israel IIRC, and President Bolsonaro of Brazil, as well as ~6000 other covid patients, who could not be more adamantly opposed to the covid vaccines.
Certainly a lot of cranks formulate baseless theories, about everything under the sun. That's not as big a problem as you think, because they're relatively easy to dismiss, being unreasonable. The most voluble and attention seeking of them are actually disinformation agents. A vast army of shills has been unleashed to promote vaccination, and one way to do this is by discrediting dissent through an army of wackos claiming all kinds of BS that rational people need to sort before being able to understand actual factual information, if they can find it in the haze.
Shills aren't just people that forthrightly promote the goal they support, but include those that harm the ability of their opponents to clearly communicate their message. I have seen more than once the conflation of Flat Earth with vaccine safety concerns, and think that's the whole reason anyone argues the Earth is flat at all: to poison the well of dissent on every topic. Folks like me that make posts aren't professional influencers with a staff of researchers to bring me cites when I remember something I've read and mention it in a post. But don't succumb to well poisoning and just consider me a crank like professional Flat Earthers pretend to be.
Regarding Agenda 2030, I've never read that document that runs to thousands of pages, if not tens of thousands. But I've watched a lot of video and read a lot of posts from folks that said they had. I've seen reporters that claim to have sources feeding them Bilderberg meeting notes and the like, but I've never infiltrated those meeting myself. I've seen Club of Rome speeches and the like, but again, do not have a direct link to a specific document revealing that 500M is their particular population target.
That figure, 500M, is not just pulled off the Georgia Guidestones, but has been bandied about for decades by Malthusians of every derivation. I have seen statements from many other public figures, and read books and papers from whole hosts of sources I did not directly cite, all of which froth at the mouth regarding overpopulation and recommend all manner of ways to reverse it.
https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/trends/Population2030.pdf
I don't know what that PDF says, because I can't open it without downloading, and I am out of room on this box. But there it is, and you can see what it says for yourself.
I can bring up a direct quote from Bill Gates saying that he can see vaccinations and medical treatment preventing population from growing by ~1B people, and it is absolutely apparent that he is indeed working on vaccination and medical treatment. It is therefore unreasonable to not consider Bill Gates as amongst the folks in this field that are intent on reducing population, in numbers genocidal. While my stream of consciousness tends to hyperbole, it does not run contrary to evidence and research I have done. I'm not making things up out of thin air, even if I can't wave a page of text with irrefutable proof. I am pretty confident in my assertions generally, and such as I am not, like all those organizations and people specifying exactly 500M as their target, is relatively immaterial to the actual issue, that being they want a lot of people to die.
As I said, there are more sources for this issue. Deagel some years back published a prediction that the population of the USA was going to plummet before 2030. Prince Philip said he wanted to come back after he died as a plague virus. I am sure you have seen some of these sources yourself, and I am not the only source for them you are familiar with. In all fairness, you could yourself state that is the case, unless it isn't so.
But here's a few links from a quick search of that figure:
"Why is 500 million the ideal human population of Earth?"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1280423/
"...writing The Population Bomb—Ehrlich placed the limit at 500 million."
http://dusit.ac.th/en/6mqxno3/population-reduction-to-500-million
Now, I haven't read any of these links, nor do I claim any of them are authoritative. But this is only from the first page of search results, and it's the only number mentioned when the topic of reducing population comes up.
I'm pretty sure you have heard that number before, because you keep an eye on media. I'm not convinced you made any good faith effort to actually research such claims before you questioned me regarding it. You wouldn't have asked for links if you'd done what I just did, and searched. It was likely a moot question then, asked to make a point, rather than a sincere quest for information. I think you're looking for something that can help you disbelieve.
What I can say is that I am seeing a coordinated conspiracy involving the media, pharmaceutical corporations, the national governments of the world, the UN (at least through the WHO), and various NGOs funded by transnational corporations, that looks like the imposition of a global totalitarian corporatocracy. The people of Victoria are under military occupation right now. France, Germany, Greece and other nations are wracked with demonstrations of millions of people right now, and they're protesting the new VAXPASS claiming people cannot buy food without it.
Our media is on the frontlines of this war committing terrorism in order to convince everyone in the world to comply with the narrative that this change is normal now. The coups that has overthrown every government on the planet is a fait accompli.
I'm not making it up. It's not a theory. You don't like it, but neither do I, and I can't think of anyone that does.
You could have run a search but you didn't. You don't want to verify this information. You want to make it go away somehow.
I wish I could make it go away, but it's not going away.
RE: End Game