9/11 was a conspiracy. You may disparage peer reviewed research published by an accredited American university after four years of study, but you do not recommend your opinion by doing so.

You also neglect the fact of history, in which agents of government have many, many times committed false flags for various reasons.

Where do you think the phrase 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned' comes from? It's how Nero became Emperor. He owned a private fire company, which set fire to the estates of the wealthy and would only put the fires out for payment. The sinking of the Maine that began the Spanish American war was a false flag. The Gulf of Tonkin incident that began US involvement in Vietnam was a false flag. Roosevelt was specifically aware of the Pearl Harbor attack because the US could read the encrypted messages of Japan.

Which conspiracy accurately details the 9/11 terrorist attack is undetermined, and much of the information that would have been useful to correctly understand who did what was illegally and deliberately destroyed by the USG, who had the evidence carted off as scrap metal, rather than allowing the NTSB or any law enforcement to examine the crime scene per long established law and precedent.

That, by itself, is actual evidence of a crime committed by the USG regarding 9/11, if only of obstruction of justice.

Do what you want. Being right isn't a given. You'll have to account relevant details to discard falsehoods, and you seem not only to not have done that, but to be desperately dedicated to not doing so regarding 9/11.