"...if there was a force generated by mass, we could get paper to stick to a wall..."
If the mass of the wall was greater than the mass of Earth below it, sure. Also, that ignores reams of other forces (known and potentially unknown) that are more powerful locally, such as static.
Because it doesn't, you claim gravity doesn't exist. That's just silly.
That you don't understand what you're talking about is the only thing I learned from this post. I dunno why you persist in posting uninformed speculation as fact, but it's not useful, nor does it lend you credence.
No honest physicist claims to have a comprehensive understanding of the universe. There are things we don't understand, and gravity is sure something we don't completely understand. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just because we don't completely understand physics doesn't mean the universe doesn't exist. Similarly, just because consciousness is actually a collective and multispecies event doesn't mean the self doesn't exist.
Please try to restrain yourself to claims that actually make sense. Humility will help by enabling you to realize you don't understand lots of stuff, so claiming you do is unreasonable.
RE: Gravity As An Effect of Mass Is Disproven. Why Do We Still Teach It?