RE: RE: The Book of the Damned - And Other Stories - Why Must Scientists Hide Data?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Book of the Damned - And Other Stories - Why Must Scientists Hide Data?

Words
685
Reading
4 min
1y

"...tombs for pharaohs..."

Egypt had kings. Yemen had Faraon. Egypt didn't use slaves to build the pyramids, or for any megalithic construction. The Yemenis had slaves. The Israelites were in captivity in Yemen, not Egypt. They liked Egypt better, so they falsified their history and said they were in captivity in Egypt. Also, the pyramids predate Egypt, even pre-dynastic Egypt.

The pyramids must predate the desertification of the Sahara, in fact. There is wave erosion near the top of the pyramid that yet has limestone casing stones, which means the pyramids were submerged, or very nearly so, and that water level never occurred after the Sahara turned to desert, but has happened much earlier.

"People can tell when someone is staring at them…"

It has been shown by the work of Michael Levin, Jacobo Grinsberg, and others, that consciousness is a collective event. All our cells each contribute, and probably all our gut fauna, and various other species that live on or in our bodies, too. Despite we experience a single self, consciousness is a collective - and we don't really know that our bodies' collective is truly separate from our neighbor's bodies' collective. More research needs doing to sort this, and much more, about consciousness, such as wtf it actually is, where it comes from, and etc. Right now we can prove consciousness doesn't arise in brains, because we can demonstrate that single cells have consciousness, learn, have goals, and etc., and single cells can't have brains, because brains are networks of neuronal cells, which single celled creatures do not have, by definition.

We know very little about consciousness, and probably quite a bit about brains, but the two are not as connected as we have been led to believe. I think the brain is more of a built in calculator with presets that has evolved because conscious entities can use such brains to good effect. However, I am not a neurologist, so who cares what I think? More to the point is there are no Consciousologists. No one knows jack all about consciousness.

"Psychics, who can see, describe the body as having seven layers."

Maybe some do. None of the claimed psychics I have ever heard or read about did. Mostly they all seem to have their own take on things, rather than that there is a consensus about anything to do with spirit or psychism. The fact is we have no quantifiable data, and all we have is anecdotal evidence, hearsay, and claims of evidence that isn't replicable. In this circumstance, scientific principles don't apply. This is why there isn't any psychic science. There isn't any quantifiable data.

"...until it is no longer needed."

You were batting 1000 until you added that bit. The Principle of Least Action bears out your statement that the cat in the box exists in every possible state, and the one that emerges in reality is the version that requires the least action potential. That is why light refracts, also, Anyway, there is no evidence that universes can conceivably be 'no longer needed' whatever the hell that actually means in that context.

You make some valid points, particularly about American archaeology, which terribly exemplifies gate keeping, and preventing us from knowing the truth about pre-Columbian American civilization. But every now and then you just make something up out of the blue, like that about not needing a universe, and you abandon any attempt to be rational, or stick to probative evidence whatsoever. I am disappoint about it, honestly.

The actual scientific method just werks. The money funding it has political purposes. That perverts what is claimed to be scientific, for political reasons. That's not a comment on science. It's nooooooticing corruption. That's not the same thing as science being unable to address metaphysics, which science can do just fine. Just produce quantifiable data, about angels, ghosts, psychics, or antediluvian American culture, and these topics can be dealt with according to the scientific method. Without such data, there is nothing for that method to apply to, and it's all just your guess is as good as mine.

Thanks!

@valued-customer: "...tombs | Ecency