I disagree that free sources of energy will provide any of the benefits you assert. Humanity has always had a source of free energy. It's called sunlight, and all terrestrial life is dependent on it. Today we have solar panels, and can print them ourselves at home using ordinary inkjet printers with graphene based inks. However, this does not provide the energy density for portable applications that petroleum, coal, and even wood provide, and as a result hydrocarbons have great value.
Developing and using 'free' energy has fixed costs, and ongoing research and development continues to lower the costs, but they will never be eliminated altogether. Please use the powers of reason I am aware you possess to reconsider your assertions so that you post factual information.
Thanks!
RE: Continuous Non-polluting Energy Sources Are Here - What This Does To Assets