I don't even care about the video quality. I note that no matter what extradimensional trickery you might postulate to explain the motive force for these objects, insofar as they exist in our dimensions, the four we can well characterize mathematically, these objects do not affect physical reality in any measurable way.

That means they do not exert force against the air, do not interact with gravity or matter or energy in any way. They do not heat the air, do not push it aside or displace it with their volume.

In other words, they are images. However, even holograms projected into the air would heat the air. No measurable energy has been detected. Since we have been detecting heat for a long time, we presumably would detect it if it were there. Even if holographic images are projected, they aren't actual aliens, aren't objects at all, and are certainly a pretense.

I don't believe objects can be expressed in our 4 dimensional plane of existence and selectively interact with the matter and forces in that reality. An object in our reality occupies volume by definition, or it is not an object.

This is the point of the quote from the paper. These alleged objects aren't objects at all, because they do not interact with our physical universe.

So, what can we deduce from the 'disclosures' provided? Make sure to apply Occam's Razor to your considerations, and the only reasonable answer you can arrive at is hoax.

That's easy to explain in every way, and known motivations (other than my own declamations in the OP) have incited many hoaxers to provably fake UFO sightings before. Other than the hoax explanation, what you are left with is utter speculation regarding physical impossibility being surmounted.

I'll stick with rational explanations that have been proven true in the past.

I could be wrong.

I doubt it.