My point is that by characterizing all scientists and science as deranged atheists, you are doing exactly what you accuse them of. Science is simply asking questions in ways that reveal answers. Some scientists are imbeciles, and there is no shortage of corrupt and unscrupulous politicians seeking means of fooling people into acting as their minions, who seize on such statements and further twist them in propaganda reports they mislabel as 'science news'.
Science does not reveal that antennae create music. It is disingenuous to say that's what science is, or what scientists do.
Neither physics nor metaphysics have proven what our reality is, and mistaking your personal belief for absolute truth simply disregards every other person's views as wrong. I don't think you mean to do this. I suggest you may be misstating your understanding of specific errors as being inherent to all science. I also suggest you are no less wrong than everyone else.
Or do you claim to be The One True Prophet all of we mere plebs should bow down to and obey unquestioningly? If not, you should phrase your statements accordingly, like 'I believe our reality is...', rather than 'Our reality is...'
RE: New Research Finds MORE Problems With Gene Editing