"...please vote marky's proposal."

I tried, I pleaded with him to use GAAP. For his proposal he could literally use double entry bookkeeping for 5 minutes a month to fully account for all income and expenses, but he declined to commit to doing so. Until DHF proposals commit to GAAP I cannot vote for them in good conscience, because there are credible allegations of theft by fraud publicly made on chain against Valueplan, and when I confronted Valueplan principals about providing receipts that would prove no fraud occurred they flatly refused, and further said they would never provide receipts.

YTF are they getting our money, then?

I pointed this out, linked it all on the Valueplan proposal post, and committed myself to never voting for a DHF proposal that would not use GAAP to account for it's disbursements of DHF funds. I am not wrong to do so. Every God damned 7-11 in the world can use double entry bookkeeping to account to it's owners how the money is being spent, and it's utterly amateurish that Hive doesn't require it's funded proposals to do so too.

Marky will just have to do without my vote if he isn't on board with the most rudimentary accounting requirements.

I will say it here again: Every one should only vote for the Return Proposal until and unless DHF proposals commit to using GAAP, simple double entry bookkeeping, to account for their expenditures of DHF - the Hive communities - money.

Thanks!