Thanks for responding @azircon. Some clarity on how @curangel determines what to downvote is appreciated. So, from your comments you're guessing that the downvotes stem from lies, conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, but you're not sure.

Here is my opinion.
These are:
Lie
Conspiracy theory
Pseudoscience
I don’t want a discussion on these facts.

It would be helpful if someone could point to any examples of lies and pseudoscience. I read Derrick's work often and he sources his material from on the ground reporting, in person interviews, to government documents.

"I don't want a discussion on these facts". So, people that are not familiar with Derrick's work come to false conclusions about his positions and claim that it is pseudoscience and conspiracies theories but do not provide a shred of evidence in support of their view? But you cannot be bothered to discuss it? Okay.

I think those that downvote his work should at least have the courtesy of explaining why they downvote and what exactly they take issue with. People can disagree but to blanket all of his work (posts) in 60+ downvotes without comment or without providing a basis is lacking, to say the least.

I regularly support Derrick's work here on Hive but I don't blindly upvoted it and I don't upvote every post either - I actually take the time to read/watch it. It has value and with increasingly censored social media landscape of perspectives that do not conform to corporate/government narratives - it's even more valuable than ever.

I also don’t see dbroze staking any hive which makes him not an investor to this platform. If he is going to sell every single hive we give him for rewards I don’t see any reason to be sympathetic to whatever cause he portrayed.

This claim is false as @dbroze has almost 10k Hive staked. Actually, anyone can see from Derrick's wallet that the majority of his Hive is staked and half of that is delegated to the @abundance.tribe project.

I don't blame you for the downvotes, I'm just trying to understand how tolerance of diversity of perspective and opinion on a 'decentralized' platform is becoming a scarce resource.