Well i think clear rules around HBD would make sense. I think the random yield on it is not smart at all.

A clear rule could be 10y bonds yield + 3%. So its an alternative to it that pays more.

But 12% or 20% is IMO not smart at all. It works like a short contract on hive that doesnt add demand on "closing".

And we need the theory in Bear market not Bull. Because limit risks is smarter as "scale" opportunity.

And i dont think "opportunity" is the right word. At 3$ hive, it would mean we already print like the FED.

So we dont need a skyhigh yield on top. And I think most people dont like the waste of DAO.

Example 3spk. They got DAO money and the project is dead ( they lost all token airdrop balances, so its 0 and everyone bought the miner token got rugged). Magi is a smart chain for Ants, you cant even trade 100$ without 20% slippage.

DAO without a clear guide is like burn the chain. Front ends depend heavy on Funding, IMO this sets the incentive to never make any revenue.

IDK, but this makes it uninvestable to hold large numbers of hive ( or lets say buy more at this cheap prices).

IMO maybe 5% of DAO funding was ok, everything else is waste and we would be better now using those funds in deep pools to be able to trade hive with size. 1M HBD/ Hive pool would be magic.