I have been studying vaccine injury for many years and solidly for the last couple of days, so your logic is wrong when you say that a lawyer is my best source of information. The lawyer is the best source of information on his specific claims since he is the one making the claims that he is evidencing.

You are correct that he did not imply causal connection between the deaths and the shots. I did not intend to mislead anyone and will happily insert the word 'may' into the title. The case is partially predicated on the reality that the shots may be causing a lot of death. In my mind, having seen the evidence I have seen, I know for sure that they are killing people - I just don't know exactly how many.