With regard to the Swine flu in the 1970s - the following video from that time makes amply clear the degree of subterfuge and denial surrounding those events:

The threat of the disease was deliberately overblown. Not long after this, industry pushed to have all ability to sue vaccine manufacturers removed in the US - opening up a nearly unlimited cash cow for them. The government was pushing for 100% vaccination at the time. People at the time pointed out that the true circumstances of the number of cases was deliberately concealed. Peopled died as a result of this criminal denial.

I'm not really sure of the coherence of the logic you are using with regard to your comments about Swine flu, since it seems to amount to 'it's fine if lots of people die unnecessarily, due to a vaccine - if there were more cases of swine flu, the deaths from the vaccine would have been fine'. I don't agree with that at all and the families of those who die or are crippled by vaccines, including children, never do either.

Please watch that video - it is not long. I am 99% sure if you'd have put the hundreds of hours into studying the rarely seen evidence I have seen surrounding vaccines over the years, you would have a wildly different position here.

When I referred to there 'clearly being an issue' - I was, in part, referring to the correlation of 90 countries showing a pattern of increased transmission following vaccine rollouts. The news reports of vaccinated people becoming super spreaders and also the many experts citing the study I shared and other data. The big picture is alarming to the majority who look at it.

I didn't downvote you for personal differences of opinion. I downvoted you for making claims of fact without support and promoting demonstrably false information in your title (as you admit in your own post) that could cost people their lives if they believe it.

The majority of people who have reviewed this post (including doctors and medical researchers) agree with it's gist. You could have a conversation, as we are doing here, in order to establish whether your own interpretation is accurate or not - before downvoting. This is a behaviour that engenders good will and community/learning. Acting like some kind of network cop, not even really doing anything to limit the reach of the post anyway - is not going to help build hive. As it happens, this post received the most views of any post in the history of peakd (according to their own stats) - not because it got upvoted, but because so many people outside of hive found it valuable and came here to view it. Free speech is needed for all views to be considered and to increase the potential for human survival. Attempts at censorship do not help that process.