Okay I understand your point, but if there is a problem in modern ranked why apply this rule not only for modern ranked but also for wild ranked, frontier, survival & brawls ?

There is neither in tournaments nor in ranked any problem with win-trading as you can ask Splinterland to group your account or they group them from themselves and than you won't face any of your account

I think here is not the place for doxing, but I know personally at least three player who scholar for than 2 accounts in brawls and I know that at least 10 guilds will be highly affected when this three

Fair enough, but why this proposal focus than all and not only modern ranked ? Why it also restrict brawls what will bring a lot of guilds in big trouble ? I understand if you have a problem in modern

If you think it's such a good idea, could you please explain to me exactly what it means? Does it apply only to ranked play or to everything? As I see it, we already have this rule for tournaments, but

Why wasn't there a call for this in the Splinterlands Discord? I don't think a guild's Discord is the right place to discuss this. So: Why wasn't there an official announcement in the official Splinterlands

I am going to downvote this proposal, because I don't think the DAO Manager should simply appoint four new treasuries—something like that should happen through a transparent application process, but not

Was sind denn Super-HIVE ? Eine neue Kryptowährung ?

I support this proposal, hoever I would suggest to use also 20,000 Riftwatchers Packs for this event.

I think Splinterhub should definitely receive the fees, and I think they should get the full 6%. As far as I understand, no more DEC will be burned in the future; instead, they'll go to the DAO. Or have

Sneaky Yellow Lips, Ancient Ruler Can I ask what is this ?

I think that the market fee should continue to go to the markets, and especially to those that offer additional services like the portfolio, such as Splinterhub.

Can I first ask why the SplinterHub-Market should be no longer eligible for Third-Party Market Earnings ? Does this only affect this market or other markets as well, and why should it be changed?

Than we should use them for the 55 days, than the BEE-Token and if HIVE, HBD and BEE are all gone we can use DEC (if there is no better idea).

In this proposal is written: "The DAO Treasurers will make monthly payments in HBD then DEC." - I cannot read anything about HIVE but maybe I have overseen something ? I think really that HIVE

I Think that the DAO should sent the Hive-token and BEE-Token first to splinterlands and only afterwards the DEC-token. I think the DAO should keep the DEC as long as there are token like HIVE and BEE

I Think that the DAO should sent the Hive-token and BEE-Token first to splinterlands and only afterwards the DEC-token. I think the DAO should keep the DEC as long as there are token like HIVE and BEE

You write: "to match Chaos Legion once the sets rotate out of modern." But Chaos Legion is since a long time out of modern, since the CA release ! Maybe you want speak from Rebellion but than

"This proposal will determine if we'd like to stop the team from making that change and essentially maintain the baseline PP at 0.5x Chaos Legion card's PP value going forward." IMO the baseline

Sorry I don't understand this: "The purpose of this proposal is to address a recent announcement made by @yabapmatt that the team was planning to adjust the PP (land production points) of cards to