Hello dear 
Yes I tryed to become approved for minting my image datasets before, and felt deeply missunderstood.
Maybe it was because the auditorian just overviewed my instagram, and looked at thousands of stone statues.
Hihi , a very interesting idea concerning absolutely unique datasets , hihi. But it was not my intention to mint unrebuildable statues, my focus lies on my blog on the #CHAINZ.
I thought the auditorian would look upon my blog on #HIVE or even click the portfolio link in 
Lets assume the auditorian did do looking at theese and still considered 
But there are several artistic works done by me the artistician.
Editing the "original" photographic image datasetblabla.
The artistician finds "something" #INSIDE the data and trys to express it in a way #it hopes the perception of other viewing persons could catch also .
Mostly there is a hint, zwo words , or a little story attached to the image data making it still easier to catch up with "my" vision .
Yes and it is done by changing the image data completely.
Maybe this is a point, the released dataset is completely different to the original data ?
Hmmm , the artistic work begins at the beach , wenn the artistician looks for beach fairies ?
Then he has and works out the released product completely digital.
No I do not think the "photographic" argument fits any more, does it ?
So I put together a spread of possible candidates for NFTisation in this post.
As such all title images of
I did not provide more than one "story" in this portfolio post, but some "names".
To add a little story makes the product a little more exclusive and artistic, ai ?
I think its worth a try approving my artisticiance on
