Keep the look of this man's look in the picture. Note the words very well. Its name is Mukesh. Do not recognize? Then let's know. Do you remember that girl in Delhi? 23 years of Jyoti? Yes, that light which was brutally killed after five more rape including this Mukesh on one night in Delhi bus. The killers were all caught. You may think that after that Mukeshos would surely regret the delusions of their evil deeds and regret them. Your idea is wrong.
Mukesh never regrets. For that reason Mukeshra can still boast - "The rapist woman is more responsible than rapists, because her dress was not right ... because she was roaming around that night ... she should not have tried to resist" etc.
If you think this thinking method is only Mukesh and his associates, then you make a big mistake. The four sides of the network are watching the moderate gentlemen, most of them actually think about it. The difference is one - Mukeshra is hero in action, they are fantasy. And among those who are a bit of a kind of thing, they say the fancy of the fantasy people in public. And those whose brains are a little more, they cling to a philosophical form of their philosophical arguments (eg: 'A reprehensible but / but B should not have ...' ).
This is called - by blaming the victim for virtue, singing the crime virtually, the criminals and their victims are measured in the same level. So that no other difference can be found between these two at one time. The demand for justice is lightened, and the culture of justice is further strengthened.
Meanwhile, Abhijeet Roy was killed in a week. He never heard of someone who was laden with ripe rice in his life. Just highlighting his concerns on marginal issues. He had to die for writing all about that. In the same way, the intellectuals are just like the Mukesh above his head and his intelligent apologists like the tune of Ghanighey - 'Abhijith's death is unreasonable and condemnable; but it must also be realized that he was an atheist ; And in the Ghanghian, this tan ends every time, usually with this national sentence - 'There is a yes, there is bound to limit / responsibility of freedom of speech?'
In this way, even the Abhijit's killers try to make a narrative attempt. Abhijits will die, they have to die. Because the Abhijithas even breathed, but nowadays how the believers have to relax. So intelligent believers write Mukta's formulas with a formula and write a new grammar of impunity in the goal goal. In their inhuman comprehension, the main theorem is the grammar - Abhijeet is responsible for the death of Abhijit, no one else!
We are all very good at this time surrounded by the oldest surroundings. The way a recently-forgotten friend wrote - what a wonderful life this is!
