Yeah, (sighs) I understand your motivation. I think you're, most likely, a good person with good intentions. I just wish there was another way...but...as you said, there is no police or law in steem. This

Not trying to attack you, but don't you see this as a type of dictatorship? You're literally a centralized source of authority. And I know that others can do the same thing, but do they really have the

For your blacklist, being the most active one, do you have documentation on my questions above?

wow, well ok then. Hard to argue against that.

So, all your building in a API that can connect to any generic blacklist? In other words, you can have 30 different lists out there, each one with their own criteria for adding/removing to the list?

I feel like these should be some very obvious questions and I'm sure he's got this documented somewhere. I just don't know where to look for that info, which also makes this very confusing. Also, I don't

Yeah, just feels like you're trading one dictator for another. Also, he downvoted you, which hides your comment. Yet another reason why I feel Steemit will continue to have issues adopting new users and

Question: What is the resolution process to get yourself off this list? How can we audit this list? For example, not only see who's on the list but why they are on the list. How many warnings did they

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this centralize power? How would this be any different from Facebook and Youtube?

Do you have a twitter account?

I'll make it simple. Which of these options resembles "Proof of Brain"? A) 1000 people upvote a post and 1 person downvotes. Creator gets 99.9999% of his/her due rewards. B) 1000 people upvote

You being the only person to disagree only proves my point. Proof of brain does not work. The "Brains" of people upvoting outnumbered the downvotes (You). You clearly are abusing the "Proof

If you believe in "proof of brain", then when you downvote, you should use the minimal amount of SP possible. Otherwise, "proof of brain" is non-sense. 99% of the folks voted positively,

This is nothing more than an organized mafia based on subjective opinions and your website is just a tool to rally the villagers to go attach others that don't meet whatever standard whales have. This

Dude, you're attitude of "this does not meet my standard" is subjective. None of the other voters were bots. Just regular folks who happened to appreciate her post. I may not agree, and you obviously

@howo, this is not how you attract Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram users to this platform. It only shows them reasons why not to switch.

So you think this mafia will attract Facebook, Instragram and Twitter users? This is a joke right? This will discourage anyone from coming here. Mafias are just another centralized form of power. Who dictates

@howo, explain all your downvotes here. Give some context.

Spent some time going through this list to see what the fuss is all about. LOL! It's pretty hilarious the type of content people are posting, pumping and then complaining that got downvoted. I know there's

I'm glad to see this altruistic honest approach to curation. My only concern with upvoting Steem related content (mostly) is this creates an echo chamber. A new person coming in will not see this as a