Words
71
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y
Just because Ned broke the social contract and his promise on how the stake will be used does not mean the agreement is now void.
To be fair, my argument was that it's the witnesses who made the agreement void, by turning a blind eye all these years to Ned breaking the promise again and again for their personal profit.
Still, that doesn't change the fact that I am a moron!!!
RE: Confusing arguments from the contrarian minority on the "Big Freeze".