I appreciate your concern, but I disagree with your interpretation. The use of AI as a writing assistance tool does not invalidate my authorship of the content. Here are my arguments:
The research and topic selection are mine. The AI does not choose what to write about.
Formulating the right questions for AI requires knowledge and judgment of my own.
I review, edit and verify all information generated. I do not publish anything without my supervision.
The use of technological tools to improve writing does not eliminate intellectual authorship.
The AI is an assistant, not the primary creator of the content.
I consider labeling this as 'fraud' to be excessive. While I understand the importance of transparency, I think there are more constructive ways to approach the use of new technologies in content creation.
Since there seems to be an irreconcilable difference in our perspectives on this issue, I have decided to migrate my content to platforms such as PeakD, where they feel there is a more open approach towards integrating new technologies into the creative process.
RE: La Crisis en Libia y el Papel Crítico del Banco Central: Un Análisis Profundo