I disagree, I think if you only had 10 or 100 participants, the data might not be very statistically accurate, but at 100 or 1000 (or the actual 98,000) people, the chance you're looking at a data anomaly is incredibly tiny.

There is less than 10k people that was infected, totally, and then the number of people that was vaccinated was growing over that period. Not easy to do proper statistics on it, but at least - if the UK and Israel is succeeding to suppress the virus with their vaccine program and the Seychelles doesn't, then clearly the Seychelles is the outlier.

It's 71% fully vaccinated. Nearly half of those testing positive are fully vaccinated.

I've read different figures, that 69% is vaccinated and 59% fully vaccinated. It could be that my source is not updated. Consider that it also takes like two weeks from one gets the vaccine until one has gained immunity, so it's the number two weeks ago we should be looking at, not the numbers of today.

Details, details. What matters is that, even when taking your numbers above, they do show that the vaccine does have some effect both at preventing people from getting infected in the first place and for preventing people from becoming seriously or even terminally ill. The problem is just that the vaccines they have been using is far less effective than what one would have hoped for - and apparently they opened up the society a bit too early.