I was debating if I should renew splinterhub bot when my subscription expires on the 18th. I keep setting the price lower but my xbot token isn't selling and you need manual survival testers. I think the

I hope this passes. I'm looking near the top of the diamond leaderboard and I'm seeing people with weak decks and low rating getting paid too much glint. It would be nice to be able to do something about

IGN: Tidepodreos Ability Name: You are Getting Sleepy Ability Effect: This card randomly gives one of your opponent's cards weary each turn. Why this card would be fun or useful: There aren't any effective

I'm not an artist and my Splinterlands battles are always the wrong kind so I think this is the first contest I can participate in.

It would be funny if they added something to her lore that said she is really an elf but Elowen will be considered a human because we don't want BF legendary elves to exist and inflate the wood supply.

I agree with the idea of reducing sps inflation, but this solution is too extreme. I used to be one of those people who played GF tournaments but had to stop when they got rid of daily rentals and it became

Are you sure about that? Look at the first tournament on your appendix. Scarred Hand is a CA only tournament. There were 38 participants and you want to cancel GFs with less than 48. If you look at the

There's already a low demand for GF cards. Core CA GFs are being sold for as little as 30 cents. My concern is if you cancel all the GF tournaments people will dump their GFs and the problem will be worse.

I will support this. I believe this proposal can eventually raise the price of Sps. But I do have concerns this could be the straw that breaks the camel's back for unhappy players. There are a lot people

It's a good idea to get out while you have a profit. People on Binance don't really need all those pools. They can just use BNB-SPS.

7 out of 11 brackets for underleveled cards seems excessive, especially since a lot of us can manage a maxed CL deck. It would make more sense to give modern ranked leagues before you do it in survival

This sounds like a good idea to me. I wish we had it a few years ago. All of the paths to get money into Hive are either unreliable, complicated, or expensive. It would be nice to have an option that is

A small liquidity pool creates a lot of slippage problems for the users and forces them to trade in small amounts. Which is unpleasant due to the high gas fees on the Eth network. It's best to exit completely.

I have mixed feelings about this. I have no problem with steemmonsters abstaining from Hive governance voting, but I think the DAO should abstain too. I don't want to see a bunch of proposals where we

This proposal makes it a lot more expensive for people who only need rentals for brawls or tournaments. Are you sure that new players will like this idea? Don't they want to try before they buy? Season

Actually, I'm not going to skip survival entirely. Between Untamed, CL, and RB I already own about a dozen summoners that rarely get used and I should see how far that gets me.

Interesting post. It looks like I'm very unprepared for survival mode and my cards on land or my rentals won't help me much. I might be better off just skipping this mode and focus on saving up for CA.

I agree with your idea that more leaderboard positions could increase competition, but I don't want to see more dec inflation. If it was up to me, I'd reduce your proposed 51-100 rewards by 50-75% and

I am a little disappointed that this proposal isn't about creating a Christmas tree skin for the runi. As for the actual proposal I don't really feel strongly about this either way. My bot never uses runi

It looks like you got your wish. That happened faster than I thought it would.