I edited the comment, removed the tags, struck part
of the paragraph & inserted something more neutral.

old
You'll notice that both of these users have published posts that will earn well over 100 HIVE. No small account dare downvote their post(s) for being over-rewarded. There would be retaliation.

new
You'll notice that both of these users have published posts that will earn well over 100 HIVE. Generally speaking, no smaller accounts dare downvote large stakeholder posts for being over-rewarded, and this is because regardless of who you downvote, the potential for downvote retaliation is real.

I hope you find this more accurate; it's possible that I conflated the two of you into one in my mind when writing that. The way the paragraph got rewritten speaks to the issue in a more general sense, I.E., why the small fish might be more reticent to treat the big fish in kind. Perhaps this makes it less offensive.

If I had spoken in a way that inaccurately portrays your blockchain behavior, then I apologize. Also, I didn't realize that you did 30% of the comments on dwinblood's post. It must have been a very intellectually stimulating article to garner so much interaction. Unfortunately for him, perhaps it was overrewarded to the point where it required your intervention.