I think what I'll do is broach the occult, which is hidden right before our eyes in everything. Let's assign the color gray to the occult, white to good, and black to bad (or-vice-versa). The occult (or the hidden) exists independently and within both the black and the white. From my perspective, the world is less black and white, and more of a gradient grey moving from darker to lighter or lighter to darker depending on where you are standing or what you're considering. The occult lays hidden within the truths and the truths hidden within lies.

The above may sound like a lot of mumbo jumbo, so I'll throw out a few analogies to illustrate my point. A man in Florida stabs someone, and the individual dies shortly after. He goes to court where the prosecutor says: "So-and-so, the crazy knife-wielder (and bath salt enthusiast), murdered my client's family member with a knife!" Batshit crazy Mr. McStaby Stab, says in reply: "That's a blatant lie, your honor! The medical records clearly show that his client died of underlying hypotension."

So, who is telling the truth? Would it surprise you if I said both were telling the truth? Would it surprise you that the victim of Mr. McStaby was diagnosed the year prior with hypotension? So, Mr. McStaby is innocent, right? Well, that's not entirely true. You see, Mr. McStaby knicked an artery in the altercation and caused the victim to experience severe blood loss, or "low blood" pressure, which in and of itself had nothing to do with the underlying condition but has the same effect.

Surely that sounds like a ridiculous analogy, but I don't think it's any more ridiculous than police killing people with tasers and them blaming the cause of death on the victim's [insert random underlying condition] which caused them to experience a state of "excited delirium." People in society are programmed to let one of these bad actors get away with such a thing (murder), and I'll give you a hint, it's not Mr. McStaby.

But how does this all relate to Dr. Stefan Lanka and whether or not pathogenic viruses exist? I think that virologists and doctors are trained to detect smoke to find the fire (or virus). The phrase "where there's smoke, there's fire" is seen as a truism. But sometimes, where there's smoke, there's a fog machine. At other times, where there's smoke, there's dry ice submerged in water. So, what doctors and possibly virologists too are testing for, when looking for a virus, is unique antibodies that viruses summon from the immune system.

So, I don't know if Dr. Stefan is a charlatan like Mr. McStaby and the Cop who can't take responsibility for what they've done, or if he's really onto something. I can tell you this; I recently listened to an interview with Alex Jones and Dr. Tenpenny. She said something to the effect that antibodies aren't necessarily an indication of acquired immunity to a virus. This is pretty groundbreaking to me because if what she's saying is true, it significantly undermines vaccine logic.

Am I right in that the guy is claiming pathogenic viruses don't exist? He's saying that viruses don't cause disease? Is he saying that viruses are harmless and intentionally turning a blind eye to the fact that they may prompt a harmful and overactive immune response or an immune disease? I don't know what to say, but color me skeptical. I'm as equally inclined to research it as I am to dismiss it entirely. One thing is for certain; If he's playing games for notoriety, I'm going to be pissed-off at some random German dude whose neck I can't put my hands around. :-)

I look forward to your next post on the topic!