RE: RE: PoB is not Happening Here [/fullstop]
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: PoB is not Happening Here [/fullstop]

Words
396
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
7y

Okay, this little back and forth is getting out of hand. I'll reply to one of the things you said directly and the rest of it generally since we've started talking past each other in many of the replies on both sides. And you can agree or disagree with that, that's just my perspective on the matter.



"Your statement necessarily included non self voters as those that did not have self esteem or believe they did good work."

What I said: "Self-voting is not "evil" I've seen self-voters who create high-quality content. If they have any sense of self-esteem and pride in their content then they will vote themselves."

The highlighted "self-voters" was the party I had referenced, and when I said "they" I was referring to that category of people. People like me. I don't know why you keep thinking that song was about you, but I'm over it. You can believe whatever you want about that statement, I've done my due diligence with regards to conveying the meaning of the words I chose and why I chose them. If I wanted to suggest that you don't have self-esteem in the quality of your work I would do so directly. I have no qualms about telling people what I think of them.



Moving on, whatever system it is that you are trying to envision, it's not going to happen unless you code it into the blockchain. There is no way that you'll force human behavior, even with downvotes, into any particular mold. I find your perspective largely incomprehensible, especially concerning the notion that people should only reward quality work when it's not their own. I mean, when you get a large vote from a power player on the blockchain, do you send'em a note saying that median posts cannot compete with the power of your stake. So please kind sir, unvote me, and revote at a prescribed value? Of course, you don't, because your self-interested just like everyone else is. I mean, if when a large stakeholder upvotes themselves at 100%--if this is some kind of injustice. Well then, it must certainly be an injustice when they upvote you at 100% too. (ツ)_/¯

I too type too much and sleep too little. So pardon me if I get cranky from time to time, just trying to be the most real me that I can be.

@thoughts-in-time: Okay, this little | Ecency