"I certainly don't purchase steem for the purpose of having a larger downvote, but my downvote is larger to be sure. I just choose to use it.

There's no denying we are undergoing a transition. But it's not like I have no skin in the game myself, though I do have less than many. It will certainly be interesting to see how this shakes out. You have a cogent argument, and I certainly appreciate the exchange."

No doubt. I guess we'll see what it does. I hope a larger number of people will reject the socialism mentality. This, in favor of a more laissez-faire approach. Not out of fear of retaliation but rather based on principle, or the general desire for a harmonious atmosphere. I did love the old steem way. However, the #newsteem carries with it a very low and negative spirit. I can feel it, even without being on the receiving end of the caustic downvotes.

I think therealwolf said it well with:

"On the other hand, downvotes are gamified actions with negative feedback loops, resulting in possible higher toxic behaviour than on any other social media.

The only example that I know of, where downvotes exist is Reddit. However, on reddit you're only "losing" visibility & possible karma, which in comparison to the real currency STEEM is more than worthless.

And there is most likely a good reason why nearly every social network only allows the user to like/upvote other content. It's simply a positive feedback loop, which is important in attracting millions of users. However, none of those social networks is actually handing out real money."

I too appreciate the open exchange of ideas, thanks!