RE: RE: Why free downvotes are a good and necessary part of STEEM
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why free downvotes are a good and necessary part of STEEM

Words
213
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
7y

"If someone comes here not believing in the idea to reward the best content they're simply in the wrong place and would be better off to browse Reddit or create their own subreddit and invest in a PoS coin."

I agree in part, but also disagree and let me explain why. Regardless of the reason they came to the platform. They provided a service in purchasing the token and continue to provide a service in the HODL if they are powered up.

The goal should be to keep them powered up. If this means they are dead set on on extracting the maximum value that the rate limited voting allows, then so be it.

If it's really a problem, fix the rate limited voting. Anything is better than a bunch of reward poolice running rampant around the blockchain looking down their nose at content creators and doing the civil asset forfeiture thing.

"That you suggest one vote per IP address shows that you would need to learn a lot more than coding. The stake weighted voting is done for a reason, imagination isn't a positive when it leads to unrealistic ideas."

I think you misunderstand, the upsort downsort would be condenser only, it would have no effect on the blockchain or the rewards.