"a) No one will be processed for accidentally misgendering people. People get processed for intentionally misgenering people with the goal to disrespect them."

It cost a lot of money to prove one's intentions in a court of law. Many people live from paycheck to paycheck. One false allegation could not only get you fired but also cause you to lapse on a rent payment or become too poor to eat or survive.

"b) Show me any statistic on how the health of citizens in countries like Germany or the Netherlands with a high quality public health care system is worse than the health in the US.
(And then add the quantity of people who go broke because of some illness in the mix)"

I'm saying the healthcare in the U.S. is terrible, and the third leading cause of death here is because of mistakes doctors make. Why would I want to be forced to pay for that out of my payroll taxes? I think I'd rather go with some cheap catastrophic coverage and do the general healing with natural remedies. Freedom allows me to make the right or wrong decisions for myself. This is a freedom I do not want to forfeit.

"c) I partially agree on education, good education is worth every cent, using this money to manipulate your population to consume, ignore the environmental impact and praise your country to avoid critical thinkers is a big problem. But educating people to have an open mind and enough knowledge for the better of the society is very costly. Especially higher education has been proven to be a good way to open peoples minds, even nowadays."

All too many people in America are too intellectually lazy to get a real education so they opt into race and gender studies for easy credits so they can get that degree hassle-free. The result is that you get more adherents to the intersectionality theory of identity, and this leads to the madness that lay within the minds of social justice warriors today. They are inclined to think that parity among all groups and different combinations of groups needs to be artificially induced with force by government. It's better to ignore group rights in favor of the real minority, which is the individual.

"d) Carbon tax: We can't expect to pollute our planet without a price, companies pay for garbage and sewage, it's just fair to pay for carbon too. We are producing way too much of it, with an enormous impact on our planet. It's time to take responsibility. We got only one planet with finite resources. We can't continue allocating 90% of those to the western world."

I almost don't even know where to start with this. First they hit us with globalwarming fears in recent decades but this was after the global cooling fears of the 70's. After hackers pwned the CRU and exposed the fact they were hiding a decline in global temperatures, global warming was quickly rebranded to climate change and nobody seemed to question it, they just started using the new term. You're coder so I know that you know the code has to make sense, there is a lot of logic invovled in coding. So here are some questions you might want to consider:

• (1.) If we cripple the economy with a carbon tax right before a world wide great depression, how many people will die?

  ---

• (2.) Will the carbon taxes cause less pollution -or- will corporations simply jack up the price of their products and buy carbon indulgences from the likes of Al Gore and David Blood. If they buy these carbon credits and pollute the same amount how will that save us from global warming as opposed to making the seller of the carbon credit filthy rich?

  ---

• (3.) If we cripple the economy with a carbon tax how many degrees in temperature rises will we prevent in the next 100 years?

  ---

• (4.) Is that number worth the destruction?

  ---

It was never about clean air, it was supposed to be about preventing the earth from warming. So let's stick to the premise of their original selling point. The atmosphere regularly cleans the air all by itself.