Bulk industrial foods dominate supply chains, while local farmers bring diversity, quality, and sustainability to the table.
Image Credit: 1 2
According to reports, the USDA intends to invest $263 million in purchasing dairy products and speciality crops to supply food banks and nutrition agencies. At first glance, it may seem like a noble attempt at assisting consumers and farmers alike; however, on a deeper level, it also raises some questions about the broader impacts on the country’s food system.
Programs like this, which involve large-scale food procurement, can sometimes promote overproduction and therefore create dependency on large scale agricultural operations. Most agricultural subsidies have historically benefited large-scale producers of goods such as dairy, corn, and soybeans over smaller family-run farms because they can produce these commodities with a greater degree of consistency at higher volume.
This system may unintentionally make it more difficult for small family-run farms to compete with industrial operations and may unintentionally discourage small family-run farms from maintaining their operations due to difficulty in competing against large industrial farms. The reliance on mass-produced food items continues to strengthen the large industrial farming sector, which is detrimental to small family-run farms. So it is worth considering how such large-scale purchases could affect smaller producers in the long term.
By providing communities with the calories they need to thrive, these nutrition programmes are fulfilling an important role in our society. According to the USDA, of the $263 million, over $148 million will be used for buying dairy products, including butter, cheddar cheese, Swiss cheese, and milk. The other remaining portion is allocated to speciality crops, including chickpeas, dried beans, lentils, split peas, pecans, walnuts and fresh pears. While the items above provide protein, fibre and heart-healthy fats, the overall selection offers limited varierty in fresh produce, leafy greens and culturally relevant foods.
Essentially, the programme supports individuals who are facing immediate hunger; however, it does not appear to be adequately providing individuals with a well-rounded diet of nutritious foods that will adequately meet their long-term needs for nutrition and/or tackle the deeper cause of food insecurity, such as lack of access to fresh/locally sourced/culturally appropriate foods.
Programs such as this provide important assistance to both families and farmers. I believe that making an effort to purchase local foods and encouraging people to grow and cook meals from raw ingredients could enrich the many meals consumed within communities. Supporting local producers can provide quality, variety, and diversity while also reducing the need for industrial-scale food production.
This report made me reflect that true food security is more than simply providing food, but it is also creating long-term solutions to support small family farms, protect the environment, and most importantly, strengthen the local community, an approach that can work alongside broader programs to benefit everyone.
References:
USDA, “Secretary Rollins Announces $263 Million Food Purchase to Support U.S. Producers” Link
Environmental Working Group, “Updated EWG Farm Subsidy Database Shows Largest Producers Reap Billions” Link
The nutritional quality of food parcels provided by food banks and the effectiveness of food banks at reducing food insecurity in developed countries: a mixed‑method systematic review Link
