I've got a problem with the naming conventions (1,2,3) for community types (open, closed, private). It creates a conflict where changes in these types will result in the creation of a new community/account altogether.

For example: if you'd like to change your open community to closed after creation, you will need to create a new one, even if it has thousands of active subscribers.

If there is no other way for whatever reason (instead of e.g. using the account metadata), then I could accept it, however, it is a nuisance.

Would be interested to hear some thoughts on this from @roadscape.