Right now, the right-wing people are asking themselves, "Why socialism?".
Socialism because it is necessary some protection for low and middle class, it is necessary not to eliminate classes as communism does but nevertheless deal with the classes as a national whole. Being rational, I recognize that if the lower class does not have their recognition, the effect will not be good for the country as well as for their moral. Their development begins to fall, due to the weak will to fight for it and this still increases the likelihood of revolutions, which is not good at all.
With this, unlike communism and extreme socialism, I do not exclude the semi-free capitalist economy, but that question I leave to another topic.
An important matter to discuss is that the big majority of the authoritarian right to approve Theocracy. The Man should have the freedom of self-conscience, self-credit, and pride. He should not be mandatorily tied to a dogmatic deity regardless of being real or not, while this question still exists. There is no concrete evidence and the government should not be guided by an assumption of such a wise entity. However, I understand the power which religion has to eliminate degeneration and how it helps mentally weak people rising their moral. By this means, I do not intend to end it radically with it being also a politically less intelligent and less worth way of acting.
Still, I am not in favor of the emotional exaggerations that socialism aims to have. Centrist Socialism generally ends up in exaggeration of freedom and individual rights, which its followers, in turn, tend to victimize themselves, and then the nation experiences worse professional quality, it loses population health, it tends to spoil the population, it ends the freedom of wealth and lowers the chances to improve national wisdom, and so on and so forth... At this specific social libertine problems, I am in favor of political conservatism ideas.
And this is how I add a good slice of socialism in "The ideal party" cake.
