Good. Look, I get what Greenpeace are trying to do but they are terrorists that spread FUD.
This is a group that claimed responsibility for Apple's focus on the environment AFTER, Steve Jobs said that Apple had already been moving that way for 20 years prior to a report from Greenpeace that said Apple was the worst for using toxic chemicals in their products. In that 20 years Apple had drastically reduced the use of toxic chemicals and was streaks ahead of the entire industry at the time. And they still are.
That's not even to mention the amount of boat rammings and illegal break-ins.
This is an organisation that has routinely broken the law thus destroying their credibility with the general public in an effort to highlight issues with the environment.
The world doesn't take them seriously anymore. There are an infinite number of ways to get the world to take notice, but they choose to use lies, blackmail, break-ins, rammings, and any number of illegal activities to try and destroy corporations, some of which actually are in the middle of trying to change their ways. Efforts largely ignored by GP.
Don't get me wrong. I don't like most corporations. I don't like how they prioritise money and shareholders over employees and the environment. But Greenpeace's methods are in many ways worse than what the corporates are doing.
Not all corporations should be tarred with the same brush but that matters not to Greenpeace. To them all corporates are bad and must be destroyed. That's pathetic logic and dangerous.
Greenpeace needs to go, or at the very least the entire higher structure must go, being replaced by rational people with more focus on education rather than eco-terrorism. Hell, some of their tactics have actually been bad for the environment. That seems a brutal failure on their part surely.
