Is it possible to live from #Steemit? Many people think this is not possible. I believe those whom think it is not possible it is just because they see it as a hobby. Others are living of it because they see it as a real life commitment and a daily job.
Hello Steemians, I hope you are all having a great time in here. Please feel free to contact me anytime you may need help or guidance. Well, I know I am a bit dramatic. The title says Quitting.... I have quitted from today, to keep my self using Bidbots1.
I truly believe #steemit has the potential to change the social networks as we know them. I also believe than there is no sense in buying votes when we are dealing with a real community of Bloggers and Writers whom approve the content anytime they do click for an upvote. If you check my profile, specifically my wallet you may until some days ago I was using the Bidbots. In this article I will explain what my plans are, the why and also some good advices for the whole #Steemit community.
1: A bidbot is an automated account that basically gives you an upvote in exchange of money, a.k.a Steem Dollars or Steem. Examples: @minnowbooster,
@appreciator,
@smartsteem,
@buildawhale, etc.
This is a very delicated subject. Some people may say that it is alright using bots. Some other may say it is not the best choice. In my humble opinion I can answer it in a double way:
It is a self-delusion mostly for the buyer of votes. My latest research, shows me that after the 25% curation fee, the Return of Investment is on red numbers.
It may help you gain exposure and followers and automatised the work.**.
**: IMHO, a real member of #Steemit takes the time to read, curate and upvote instead of just selling his voting power.
Many serious communities out there and many members consider this self-delusion practice as a very bad habit which may cause you never getting an upvote from serious Bloggers and curation communities. I could say many people in #Steemit still do the work of searching a good article, reading it and giving it an upvote depending on the quality of writing. This is why I am quitting using Bidbots. Currently I am running a curation community so I won't give a bad example to new users and also the regular ones.
So are you calling all the whales whom create/use a Bot, lazy people?
If the whale2 is a very busy person who cannot curate by himself and there is no way to delegate some of his Voting Power to a community or group of people whom may do the task, then I could say it is somewhat valid creating a BidBot, but what is the true meaning of all of this(Steemit) if we just want to pursue more money instead of quality of posts? I cannot judge people but I do have the rights to draw some attention in order to improve ourselves as a real community of bloggers where the good content is our more important resource.
So who is the lazy one?
I would dare to say that the Lazy one is the person who uses the BidBots in order to just gain more money or to promote trash. For example, today I read this amazing article that propose something that may help Steemit for the better and I cannot believe the actual state of the network where there is a lot of posts in trending section just because of the BidBots. The post I have just told you about it should be within the trending section for sure.
2: A "whale" is an account with massive Voting Power. Theoretically is an account who has the power to decide the future of the network.
My Steem Power growth - Steempeak.com tools -
At the beginning of using bots, due to some key factors like #Steem's price was very high and BidBots were "giving away" more than 300% of the initial vote purchase, everything was going amazing. I didn't realise the damage I was doing and the laziness I was creating all around me. One year after that, I have proved myself than using Bots doesn't work anymore and does not align with the higher purposes of this platform. Steemit was intended to create amazing content, great projects and to give life to many incredible ideas.
Keep myself writing, curating, promoting #Steemit, without having the pressure of being pursuing more money. We all can make money by other means and it is just matter of time, patience and a lot of practice. I consider we have a great opportunity here to show the to Internet-world than a social network can share amazing content and give real reward to people.
This is one question too often I get a lot. Many people in Venezuela ask me about this. At the beginning I was in a hype just answering Yes, you can, we all can. Right now after doing a lot of research I can openly say:
For a regular user, who is not a whale, nor a big investor, nor somebody who do not have the support of 3 or 4 whales accounts, living of publishing on Steemit it is just like Chasing the unicorns. It means it is not possible.
The ways some people can live of Steemit and use this as a real income in a monthly basis, based on my research are:
So this bring up the question: Should we treat steemit as a hobby or as a real Blogging/Writers platform? I truly believe we can change people's lives but if we keep doing what we are doing in this platform, we may not affect people in the best way.
Decentralising real power to the people. I know the Steemit developers had work too hard to make this happen, also the core team but, all of this potential needs to be opened and re-directed to the writing/blogging community. It is not fair giving just "pieces" of the reward pay to people who are truly constructing great posts and projects. It is not nice how I see many good bloggers leaving #Steemit just because they cannot be part of the core group, almost an Elite.
At the beginning I was amazed realising that in fact Steemit is creating it's own Steems and we are keeping together an economy. I still see this as something great but, what are we doing with such power of creating money? what do we do now if the money was the problem and now we have it?
I see many people publishing a lot of great articles. Many of these people are doing an amazing work. I see many people publishing garbage and promoting trash themselves. I truly believe in diversity. This is necessary in order to have different points of view and many types of perspectives. What I cannot understand is not solving primary issues in order to really reward people. If we see this as a hobby we could change the old slogan from:
Maybe as @rok-sivante said: "For Quora, such an arrangement could be a huge win." - source
So theghost what do you propose?
With love for all of you guys: @ausbitbank,
@themarkymark,
@ned,
@blocktrades,
@cervantes,
@freedom,
@pumpkin and to all of you in here. Thanks for your time to read this article. STEEM ON, boys and girls.
Diseñado por @orelmely