Hold the balance to secure their account funds which where frozen.
ONe fact which is certain is this was a reaction to his account being frozen. Freezing his account was a hostile action to him and all large account holders. IT showed that large stake holders must answer to the current witness central authority or risk having the funds frozen. Now justins lawyers claim this was illegal, if so then the witnesses are hackers. WHen will the witnesses come forward with legal advice supporting their actions of freezing legal property?