You don't even listen to the people you're trying to shill for very well. Matt said clearly he would COMPLY WITH LAWS. So your example of government chasing content on 10 computers is not even how the creators envision the system.

On that point though. That presents a conundrum. Because either content lives un-tethered to the platform and yes like your point, authorities are playing cat and mouse, or 3Speak has ability to nullify it under obligations of local laws... which then makes clear that a central authority or "backdoor" to content would exist.

The tokenomics also makes no sense. So the platform will only need Hive resources to store text? Who the hell cares about text when posting video content... just for the video title? Then you say there's going to be a 3Speak token. So what will that be used for if text is on Hive and each video attached to their community either individually tokenised or stored by Hive users. So what's the need for a 3Speak token. What's its purpose and what would give it value?

You might be thinking, "you're so pessimistic man.." but frankly I don't give a crap. One thing I do well is find flaws in things to improve them and this grand idea of 3Speak has so many flaws. If they're serious about it then it needs a lot of work because there's nothing about it that tells me it has potential to be the next video system.

A thing provided to Hive loyalist is all I see. It could only take off of by utilising an already established large network like bitTorrent. If only Hive users will be the content hosts then how the hell is that going to create network effect?