I think you mix objectivity with subjectivity and thus your message becomes conflicting. MORALITY for instance is subjective. To say "Immorality ought to not exist" is EXCLUSIVELY SUBJECTIVE. For example, we humans, believe that it is morally wrong to kill a child/offspring/young life. There is essentially NO EXCUSE that would see that any other way. YET.. a LION (which objectively, is a life form equal to man) does that very thing. We the human then rationalise it, as part of Lion Existentialism. We still don't accept it as right, but we do view it as JUST and essentially compartmentalise it.

LION has no concept of morality though, and we know that, (though we have no absolute proof) but it is not something that we then say "because we are aware of morality, we must now END LION and it's immoral ways." Again, we accept the compartmentalisation of conflicting beliefs. So then.. SUBJECTIVITY is the ruling factor. From existence of Human.. it will never be OK to kill child. Yet as an observer of Lion, we accept it as "that's just how they maintain pure bloodlines"

A FORK also.. is just a formed metal, shaped in one end into 3 (or more or less) points that then interact with the matter which A FORK is utlized for: FOOD. "A FORK" does not exist. That is just the term used to described this relatively innate piece of matter which is one of many that constitutes the technology we refer to as UTENSILS.

I see your post as more about IS DISCOVERED and YET TO BE DISCOVERED. That YES, consciousness is the great frontier in that endeavour. However, discovery is also dependent on PROCESS. Consciousness already has ability to TIME TRAVEL. We do it via recollection of MEMORY. Of course this is completely virtual, but then.. that is PRECISELY the realm of consciousness. TO ACTUALLY travel through the spacetime continuum other than forward through each NOW FRAME that we experience as EXISTENCE is then much more complex. YET, PROCESS of discovery will likely one "day" lead us to not view TIME TRAVEL as the impossibility that is is to us now.

So PROCESS, not consciousness is then what leads to that. When we discover ability to revert to a previous frame, to then allow that frame of PAST to accept an already expressed energy signature and for that Energy of the FUTURE ENTITY to re-interact with an already PAST STATE.. etc etc... I'm not going to give it all away that easy...

kidding I have no clue.

Anyway I really like your writings.. I really enjoy reading your wordings. I just think this post mixes two very different elements of existence and expression. IMO, (as you've identified) CONSCIOUSNESS is the ONLY REALM of REALITY. I see matter as the INSTANCE emerging out of the virtual, claiming place upon the fabric of spacetime. Again, like you point out MANIFESTATION is then what brings that new "light" (instance) into BEING.