Yes - how to we scream this loud enough to get our "democracy" to write a proposal?

people in other timezones that just had no opportunity to make this purchase. This is an utterly ridiculous claim. Humans have proven for centuries they are capable of being awake and alert at whatever

if it wasn't worth taking off work for - then you didn't want it as bad as others and you don't get the limited supply...that is how limited supply works. Show up when available, or miss out.

Imagine if you get in that situation next time? It was ..and I CHECKED the confirmation, knowing I hadn't entered the vouchers that I KNEW ahead of time were required. So.. I hit "cancel" on

10% inflation with a large chunk of that going to splinterlands which will kept mostly off the market What gave you the crazy idea that SPL will be getting any of these additional promo cards? They won't

also agreed - I'm not here arguing for a 10% discount on the purchase in exchange for being happy about the promo print increase by any means. I'm just making it clear that IMO - changing a product after

Correct - the packs still hold some % of the value I was purchasing. While I would potentially consider compensation to those in the 500k for the increased liquidity vs what was promised in rewards cards...

No - I bought X packs, AND X/Y %% of the total supply of the promo card. If the Y changes as proposed, what I bought has changed.

Changing the whitepaper after the fact will have long term ripple effects - SPL can not be trusted if they allow this. Simple. Smart investors will think twice - "are they lying this time too?"

Changing what I purchased after the fact in any way is unacceptable.

1 - NO 2 - Yes 3 - NO Any deviation from the 500k packs listed in the whitepaper will completely destroy credibility of the system and result in smart investors looking elsewhere. Users, like me - accepted

this doesn't work. As in, the transaction is posted, but the card is not rented.